Skip to content

What actually makes a supplier deposit safe or risky?

The account-verification habits that catch most wire fraud, and why a normal deposit structure isn't itself a red flag.

Most supplier payment fraud isn’t sophisticated — it relies on a buyer skipping a basic verification step under time pressure, not on an elaborate scheme. A few consistent habits close off most of the actual risk.

The normal structure isn’t the problem

For larger orders paid by bank transfer, a smaller deposit upfront with the larger remaining balance due before or against shipping documents is a standard, widely used structure, with the upfront share well under half the total. This structure itself isn’t a warning sign; it’s simply how larger China-sourced orders are typically financed, distinct from the mobile-payment tools covered on the WeChat and Alipay page, which aren’t built for transactions at this scale in the first place.

What actually matters: where the money goes

Pay into a verified company bank account whose name matches the business you’re contracting with — not a personal account, and not an account under a different company name with an explanation attached, however plausible the explanation sounds. This single check catches a large share of deposit fraud on its own, because a fraudulent request very often routes around it in some way.

The account-change request is the single biggest red flag

A supplier suddenly asking you to send payment to a new account — a different bank, a different name, sometimes just before a payment is due — is one of the clearest signs of a compromised email or intercepted communication, a well-documented pattern in international wire fraud generally, not specific to sourcing from China. Verify any such request through a channel you already trust — a phone number you had before the request, not one included in the message itself — before sending anything.

Match the paperwork to the payment

The account name on a wire transfer should match the entity named on your invoice and, ideally, on the business license you’ve already verified separately. A mismatch you can’t get a clear, consistent explanation for is a reason to pause the payment, not a detail to wave past because the rest of the deal feels far along.

For a first order with an unfamiliar supplier

Consider whether the order justifies a documented purchase order with clear terms before any money moves — covered on the contracts page — and whether the size of the order justifies paying for independent verification of the supplier before committing to the deposit at all.

What’s next

Read how to put the deal in writing properly, or go back to the broader guide to sourcing scam mechanics this specifically protects against.

Frequently asked questions

Is a minority deposit upfront with the balance due before shipping a normal structure?
Yes — a smaller share paid upfront with the larger remaining balance due before or against shipping documents is a standard structure for larger orders paid by bank wire transfer, not itself a warning sign. What matters more than the exact split is where the money is going and how well the account has been verified.
Should I ever pay a supplier deposit to a personal bank account?
This is one of the clearest warning signs available — a legitimate business transaction should go to a verified company account, not an individual's personal account, regardless of how good an explanation is offered for the difference.
What should I do if a supplier suddenly asks me to send payment to a different account?
Treat it as a serious warning sign and verify independently before sending anything — contact the company through a phone number or email you already had before the request, not through the same channel the request came from, since that channel may be the one that's been compromised.